The Film Ignite Sessions’ writers’ edition forced an uncomfortable reckoning: in a country bursting with untold stories, why do our screens feel repetitive? Across two panels featuring Eddie Butita, Brian Munene, Elias Mutendei, Zainabb Mejja, Santa Mukabana, and Helga Muinde, Kenya’s writers confronted not just how they write, but what they choose to write—and why.
Throughout the session, one question rang clear; are we suffering from lack of imagination, or simply playing it safe? The answer, it became clear, is more complex than either explanation alone.
Brian Munene’s passionate defense against the “single story” criticism revealed the psychological burden writers carry. His frustration with reductive industry characterizations reflected broader tensions between creative ambition and critical reception. When creators spend energy defending their work against simplistic criticism, they have less energy available for actual creative development, and if writers believe their work will be judged according to narrow criteria, they may limit their creative exploration to meet those expectations. Writers second-guess culturally specific elements, dilute local references, and smooth rough edges that might confuse international audiences. The result isn’t necessarily bad writing, but it’s often safe writing.
Santa Mukabana’s advocacy for fantasy exposed how genre assumptions limit story selection. We have the richest mythological traditions on the continent, but we’re not mining them because we think fantasy isn’t African. This reveals the colonial hangover in story selection, the unconscious belief that certain types of narratives don’t belong to us, that we should stick to social realism and contemporary drama.
Eddie Butita’s mathematical approach to storytelling addressed the commercial pressures that shape content selection. Writers aren’t just choosing stories they want to tell; they’re choosing stories they think will get funded, distributed, and watched. This economic filter influences everything from character types to plot structures to thematic emphasis.
Elias Mutendei’s focus on animation writing highlighted one of the industry’s most significant missed opportunities. Animation offers Kenyan storytellers unique advantages: lower production costs, unlimited visual possibilities, and access to demographics that live-action content struggles to reach. Animation could address several persistent industry challenges. Budget constraints that kill ambitious live-action projects become manageable in animation. Historical or mythological stories that would require expensive period reconstruction become feasible. Target audiences, particularly younger demographics, that remain largely unserved by current content offerings, represent accessible markets.
The platform suppression discussion revealed external forces shaping internal creative choices. Writers described being asked for “authentic African stories” that fit predetermined templates, stories that look local but function according to international narrative conventions. This creates a peculiar form of cultural ventriloquism where writers perform authenticity rather than express it.
Zainabb Mejja’s guild perspective addressed professional pressures that influence story selection. Writers working without institutional support often chase trends rather than develop personal vision. They write what sold last year rather than what needs to be written now. Guild structures could provide the professional security that enables creative risk-taking.
Helga Muinde’s challenge to move beyond drama and comedy-dramas wasn’t just about genre expansion, it was about creative limitation. Kenyan writers have defaulted to familiar narrative territories not from inability, but from a mix of market pressure and risk aversion that has calcified into creative habit.
This catalog of unwritten stories exposed the real problem: it’s not that Kenyan writers lack imagination or material. It’s that various pressures; economic, cultural, professional, have created an environment where writers self-censor before anyone else gets the chance to censor them.
The conversation revealed writers trapped between competing demands: be authentic but universal, be local but marketable, be original but familiar. These contradictions produce creative paralysis that manifests as generic storytelling, not because writers can’t imagine better stories, but because they’ve learned to doubt them before writing them.
Brian Munene’s call for confidence wasn’t just psychological pep talk—it was recognition that creative boldness requires professional conditions that support risk-taking. Writers need economic security, institutional backing, and audience development that rewards rather than punishes creative ambition.
The evening’s most important insight was that the question “What are we writing?” can’t be separated from “What are we afraid to write?” Until Kenyan writers address the fears, economic, cultural, and professional, that constrain their story selection, they’ll continue producing competent work that feels smaller than their actual capabilities.
The stories and talent are there. What’s missing is an ecosystem that encourages writers to trust their instincts rather than second-guess them.
To book exclusive events with a TICKETING PARTNER, check out tickets.sanaapost.com 😎👊🏾
